Hi Guennadi,

> +struct s6e63d6 {
> +     unsigned int bus;
> +     unsigned int cs;
> +     struct spi_slave *slave;
> +};

could we use "bus" and "cs" from struct spi_slave? "struct spi_slave"
declares them already. Maybe we should drop struct s6e63d6 entirely and use
struct spi_slave instead?

Best regards,
Anatolij
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to