On 22:30 Wed 14 Jan , Paal Bakken wrote: > I have testet a lot more and have found the following: > > 1. I tried an old USB 1.0 stick, but got the same bad result... > > 2. Then I took that USB 1.0 stick and deleted multiple partitions with linux > fdisk and created a single bootable FAT32 partition. This variant worked > without any problems in u-boot. (the multiple partitions seems to be typical > from the vendors) > > 3. Then I took the USB 2.0 stick (from the trace in my first mail) and did > the same repartioning with fdisk. But this stick still gives the same bad > result :-( > > So???? > > Are there any known limitations/requirements to the u-boot USB implementation? > -USB1.0 vs USB2.0 > -How to partition the stick (if the original partition can't be used) > -Other > > ...and once more: the USB 2.0 stick works fine in linux.... I'll take a look on my 9263ek
but I've test recently a 4GB usb 2.0 key on the at91rm9200ek with any problem btw please limit your mail at 80chars per line Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
