On Friday 31 October 2008, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Related to the discussion we had earlier today about linking to libgcc I > have here a experimental patch that removes the linking to libgcc. > I called it experimental because I am not able to test if all architectures > still compile properly, and as such it needs more (build)testing before > integrating. I tested several ARM boards, and they all compile and link > fine. > > I am convinced that it is the way to go to remove libgcc of the link list, > but if we integrate this patch I cannot guarantee it does not break some > builds, but it makes clear which boards are depending on interfaces from a > library it should not depend on in the first place. Those boards might need > additional patches. > > I hope you can find some time to do some more compile testing across > different architectures.
it will break Blackfin builds as there are a bunch of places where the compiler generates calls to libgcc i cant see why you'd want to remove libgcc or why you think this is a correct long term goal, but Wolfgang already made a much more detailed list ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
