On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Last time Scott Wood suggested to use nand_spl you replied "I think using > > nand_spl is the best approach, but it will needs more effort to complete." > > and "Anyway, right now we can have iMX31PDK booting with this code as an > > option for users willing to use U-Boot in this board." So, what's the > > status of this effort? If this your new submission, which still doesn't > > use nand_spl is not really targeted for upstream merge, I think, it would > > be better not to mark these mails "PATCH". Or have I missed anything? > > > > This patch is just a rebase of previous patch, to be merged on > u-boot-arm/master repository. > I don't have nand_spl working until now. > > I am new sending patches to u-boot mailing list. So what is the > problem when calling it of "PATCH"? Please, let me know about my > mistake, can you explain about it?
My understanding was, that the patch in this form, i.e., not using nand_spl should _not_ be accepted in the mainline and you sent it to the list just as a FYI for users willing to use your solution. That's why I suggested not to mark it as a "PATCH." I haven't followed discussions of your previous submissions of this patch very closely, so I might have missed something, but I would agree with Scott and wait until a nand_spl version of this patch appears, and _not_ apply this patch in its present form. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
