Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> With this Command it is possible to add new I2C Busses,
> which are behind 1 .. n I2C Muxes. Details see README.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> README | 47 ++++++++
> common/cmd_i2c.c | 269
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> cpu/mpc8260/i2c.c | 15 +++-
> drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c | 15 +++-
> include/configs/mgcoge.h | 1 +
> include/configs/mgsuvd.h | 1 +
> include/i2c.h | 23 ++++
> 7 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Does not apply:
Applying I2C: adding new "i2c bus" Command to the I2C Subsystem.
.dotest/patch:50: trailing whitespace.
=>
.dotest/patch:269: trailing whitespace.
.dotest/patch:271: trailing whitespace.
error: patch failed: include/configs/mgcoge.h:203
error: include/configs/mgcoge.h: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: include/configs/mgsuvd.h:373
error: include/configs/mgsuvd.h: patch does not apply
fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c).
Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
Patch failed at 0006.
Please rebase and resubmit.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which
divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being
correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough. - Niels Bohr
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
