On Aug 18, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Aug 18, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Kumar Gala, >>> >>> In message <Pine.LNX. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > you wrote: >>>> Move to using the environment variables 'ethaddr', 'eth1addr', >>>> etc.. >>>> instead of bd->bi_enetaddr, bi_enet1addr, etc. >>>> >>>> This makes the code a bit more flexible to the number of ethernet >>>> interfaces. Right now we assume a max of 10 interfaces. >>> Hm... where exactly is this artificial limit coming from? Do we >>> really >>> need it? >> We need some upper limit to stop checking at. > > It might be better (and more efficent) to iterate over the > environment, and check each name against the eth*addr pattern.
Its probably easier/less work to iterate over the aliases looking for "ethernet*" pattern, I can do that if its desired. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
