Kumar Gala wrote: > On Aug 18, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Dear Kumar Gala, >> >> In message <Pine.LNX. >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>> Move to using the environment variables 'ethaddr', 'eth1addr', etc.. >>> instead of bd->bi_enetaddr, bi_enet1addr, etc. >>> >>> This makes the code a bit more flexible to the number of ethernet >>> interfaces. Right now we assume a max of 10 interfaces. >> Hm... where exactly is this artificial limit coming from? Do we really >> need it? > > We need some upper limit to stop checking at.
It might be better (and more efficent) to iterate over the environment, and check each name against the eth*addr pattern. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
