On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 03:53, Alejandro Colomar <a...@kernel.org> wrote:
> Even if that's non-standard, as long as it's a valid GNU > date, I'm happy with it. I put much more detailed thoughts on both immediate-term fixes and longer-term suggestions on GitHub where they were first requested: https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/1202 But, within the scope of this conversation, it mostly boils down to adding one further qualification: "as long as it's a valid GNU date *which matches the actual behavior of the system*" GNU date(1) interprets such "yyyy-mm-ddZ" constructions as 00:00 UTC, but in casual conversation, expiration dates are generally assumed to mean 24:00 by convention unless otherwise specified. Depending on the actual behavior of your system, being more explicit at the expense of some verbosity may be a better longer-term/transitional choice. -- Tim Parenti
