Hi Paul, Ping. Could you please have a look at this? We have some nasty bugs in shadow, and are yet undecided on how to fix them.
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 01:43:36PM GMT, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > I like this approach the most. Which made me wonder... is date(1) > > fancy? > > > > $ date --date='2023-09-20[+0200]' > > date: invalid date ‘2023-09-20[+0200]’ Does this kind of date-with-timezone look good to you? Would you add support for it in GNU date(1) (via gnulib)? Have a lovely day! Alex > > $ date --version > > date (GNU coreutils) 9.4 > > Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later > > <https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>. > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > > > > Written by David MacKenzie. > > > > It seems not. Paul, should I report a bug to coreutils, or do you have > > plans for it already? It would be interesting if date(1) would accept > > these suffixes. > > Now I remember, coreutils uses gnulib for that, as you told me some time > ago. It would be a gnulib report. :) > > > -- > <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
