>> I wonder if I should also change all class names. For example rename >> TWSocket to TOverbyteIcsSocket or TIcsSocket. This way, ICS component >> would be clearly identified. This of course would require a lot of >> changes in >> existing applications, including in dfm.
> I'm not fully against, I say 60% keep the actual naming. I have not taken the final decision yet. I'm still grabbing other's opinion. Many component vendors or ICS competitors always to a lot of changes between versions. ICS never done that and it is one major strength of ICS. I'm very tempted to preserve this strength. But the cost in term on code complexity (I mean into the component) is more and more heavy. That's why I consider restarting on new fresh base. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
