sorry, I missed the beginning of the thread / discussion: are you
working on a new, full Twisted reactor on top of io_uring?
and async filesystem is "just" one part / additional effort in that?
Am 12.03.21 um 05:42 schrieb Ian Haywood:
On 11/01/2021 8:26 pm, Glyph wrote:
seems somewhat irrelevant to the "asynchronous filesystem" part of
this PR - do you think you could do a smaller version of this which
decouples it from smb and ctypes?
but yes both can be spun out easily, so it's just the interface and a
plain portable threads-based implementation. Where in the twisted
tree should the interface and implementation go?
(It would also be nice to have an interface that acts as an
IProducer to integrate more natively with Twisted's support for
backpressure rather than only having a custom readChunk method. I
think readChunk is still necessary for completeness since you need
to be able to seek and offset, though.)
certainly will look at this. It fits well with FTP's filesystem
interaction.
OK this is done. I have changed the name to "asyncfs" in the hope this
is more informative.
https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/10079
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
