> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:42 PM, Ian Haywood <i...@haywood.id.au> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/01/2021 7:23 am, Glyph wrote:
>> 
>> The mess of ctypes stuff
> unclear what you mean: either the aio implementation or statx.py 
> 
Both, really, but I was mainly talking about statx.py.
>> seems somewhat irrelevant to the "asynchronous filesystem" part of this PR - 
>> do you think you could do a smaller version of this which decouples it from 
>> smb and ctypes?
> but yes both can be spun out easily, so it's just the interface and a plain 
> portable threads-based implementation. Where in the twisted tree should the 
> interface and implementation go?

I'd say probably twisted.internet?  (This is something that might get modified 
as folks review & comment)

>> (It would also be nice to have an interface that acts as an IProducer to 
>> integrate more natively with Twisted's support for backpressure rather than 
>> only having a custom readChunk method.  I think readChunk is still necessary 
>> for completeness since you need to be able to seek and offset, though.)
> certainly will look at this. It fits well with FTP's filesystem interaction. 
> 
> 
Thank you so much!

-g
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python

Reply via email to