On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Hynek Schlawack <h...@ox.cx> wrote: > > I have to disagree here BTW. When I started using Twisted as a WSGI > container, I was vexed by its lack of docs (and I’m still confused about > many details). There’s a few blog posts around but none of them reach the > straight-forwardibility of e.g. gunicorn’s docs. I’ve ended up asking > around on IRC, stealing from Donald/PyPI, and reading source code. > > I honestly believe, we’re leaving money on the table here. Using Twisted > as a WSGI container should be first class use case on the web page since it > presents a nice entry drug into the ecosystem. >
If someone was not dedicated to Twisted, why would they even bother going through all the steps that you did to figure out how to use Twisted as a WSGI container? I'm amazed that even you did not give up. :) Do you have any idea how Twisted fares in performance benchmarks of WSGI containers? Moshe's presentation didn't cover this, and I forgot to ask him at the presentation. I also couldn't find any WSGI benchmarks which included Twisted. -- Craig
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
