> On Feb 22, 2017, at 9:17 AM, Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 22/02/17 13:06, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: > >> Ah! They are now, maybe you haven't seen them? >> >> Check out https://github.com/pypa/manylinux and >> https://github.com/pypa/python-manylinux-demo > > I had not seen this. Thanks, this looks like a big leap forward. > >> A lot of people seem to be thinking that way. /Personally/, with my >> experience with Go (about five months solid at previous employer), I >> wouldn't go anywhere near that stack. There are plenty of >> /other /things with appealing features that Python lacks which would >> seem to make a better move. :) > > Very possibly! > > Go as a language leaves me cold, and there are downsides to the > one-big-binary approach. But it's undeniably easy to deploy in a container, > and the concurrency is very attractive.
Python is easier to deploy in a container than you might think. Check out this three-line Dockerfile from Moshe Zadka (which, by the way, deploys Twisted...): https://moshez.wordpress.com/2016/11/19/belt-suspenders-why-put-a-pex-file-inside-a-docker-container/ <https://moshez.wordpress.com/2016/11/19/belt-suspenders-why-put-a-pex-file-inside-a-docker-container/> -glyph > >> But check out the story for binary wheels. The state of things in >> Python may not be /quite/ as bad as you think. > > Indeed, it does look like a promising improvement. > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
