> On 22 Feb 2017, at 18:16, Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> #2 seems useful now that I know about it but - correct me if I'm wrong - the 
> manylinux1 permitted C dependencies are super-tiny, and would not permit e.g. 
> cryptography or psycopg2?

Depends.

The permitted C dependencies *for dynamic linking* are tiny, sure. But those 
libraries may statically link as they please. The likely scenario for most such 
packages is that they statically link whatever they need. This is the approach 
taken by some that I ship.

Cory


_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python

Reply via email to