+1 from me as well. Depending directly on how twisted installs itself seems
problematic. In my opinion, the more we discourage this practice the better.

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 8:00 PM Tristan Seligmann <mithra...@mithrandi.net>
wrote:

> +1 from me
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 02:35 Craig Rodrigues <rodr...@crodrigues.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I understand the motivation, but the time to have done this was when
>> dist.py
>> was originally reviewed.
>>
>> There are real problems in the Twisted code, and in the Twisted
>> infrastructure.
>> Focusing on something like this instead of those problems seems pointless,
>> gratuitous and of little benefit.
>>
>
> The problem is that if we defer this change until later, it becomes a lot
> more work then. If we do it now, while nobody is depending on the module,
> then we save ourselves that work in future by doing a trivial amount of
> work now.
> _______________________________________________
> Twisted-Python mailing list
> Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
> http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
>
-- 
- Chris
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python

Reply via email to