+1 from me On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 02:35 Craig Rodrigues <rodr...@crodrigues.org> wrote:
> > I understand the motivation, but the time to have done this was when > dist.py > was originally reviewed. > > There are real problems in the Twisted code, and in the Twisted > infrastructure. > Focusing on something like this instead of those problems seems pointless, > gratuitous and of little benefit. > The problem is that if we defer this change until later, it becomes a lot more work then. If we do it now, while nobody is depending on the module, then we save ourselves that work in future by doing a trivial amount of work now.
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
