On 03/02/2013 03:24 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > I don't really understand how this is any easier with PB than with > AMP, though. With AMP, you "just" need the same command definitions on > both sides. With PB, you need the exact same Python code versions for > every class you are sending over the wire;
I don't use PB like that. I only ever send simple data structures made of builtin types (int, str, list, dict). > You don't quite have to do a TCP handshake for every request you want > to send over an HTTP channel, but there are still some problems. You're not telling me anything I don't already know. My point is that, for the use-cases *I* have, those limitations have not proven to be a problem, so the effort > asymmetric (client makes requests to the server, server cannot make > requests to the client, so you need to do some kind of long polling / > inversion of control to simulate this). Yes. _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
