Le 1 mars 2013 à 23:27, Glyph <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> a écrit : > > On Mar 1, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Benjamin BERTRAND <bee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I was hoping to avoid having to put something like AMP in place, because it >> looked a bit overkill for my case. >> I think I actually found a way :-) > > > In what way is it "overkill"? The dictionary says that > <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/overkill> is "an excess of what is > required or suitable, as because of zeal or misjudgment". What is AMP too > much of? Memory? CPU? Bandwidth? API complexity? Code size? As compared > to what?
"overkill" wasn't maybe the proper term to use. I was just referring to code complexity based on my knowledge, or lack of knowledge :-) I had the impression AMP is used when you need to exchange various command/response. I don't need all that "power" as I just want to pass some messages. I thought using a deferred like I did in my code example was easier. Not sure though as Jean-Paul pointed it probably doesn't work. My server already uses a specific protocol to communicate with the client. So I don't really see how to integrate AMP there. Do you have any example? Thanks Benjamin > > -glyph > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
