On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:56 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Kevin Horn <kevin.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Note that you can wait on more than 64 objects at a time, just not using a >> single WaitForMultipleObjects call. The MSDN page Glyph pointed out has a >> little more info. > > The proposed solutions, however, seem rather unsatisfactory. If you're > going to start spawning new threads to monitor everything, you might > as well just do IOCP in another thread, or even in the main thread (at > least as far as I know).
I think we may be close to the point where we can drop win32eventreactor completely. I think IOCP can deal with arbitrary Windows events too, so if we just expose that in a compatible way, and whatever else comes along with it, we can just delete win32er without losing any functionality. (Or maybe we already do? Not my area of expertise any more :)). _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
