On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Keith Winston <keithw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sigh.... and this line needs to read (if it's going to do what I said):
As Alan pointed out, the examples provided do NOT account for order, so if one uses my (corrected) algorithm, you get different results from the examples. Without the fix you get the example results, but may not realize that it's not accounting for repeats in that case (which the instructions don't address either). It might be instructive, if it's not already obvious, to understand why this would be... _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
