Am Montag, 23. November 2015 16:55:05 UTC+1 schrieb Cédric Krier:
>
> On 2015-11-23 06:42, Hendrik Brandes wrote: 
> > Am Samstag, 21. November 2015 14:35:04 UTC+1 schrieb Cédric Krier: 
> > > Using multi-company should always been the last solution because it is 
> > > complex and has many constraints like using exactly the same sets of 
> > > modules for all companies etc. 
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok, but that's no problem in this context at all. For me it looks like 
> an 
> > alternative idea for having this shared-warehouse concept. 
> > But through the discussions about having multi-company instances, I 
> wonder, 
> > how long this feature stays within the tryton-kernel. 
>
> I think you should ask the opposite question when will multi-company 
> available. But as usual, we can not answer such question. 
>
> > > Indeed what you describe looks like a EDI communication between the 
> > > companies. There have been already many discussion about this topic 
> but 
> > > as far as I know there is not yet any module available. 
> > > 
> > 
> > Regarding the EDI: Do you think, that using proteus within a tryton 
> module 
> > is possible? 
>
> I don't see the point. But I guess as far as you have the credentials. 
>
> -- 
> Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL 
> Email/Jabber: [email protected] <javascript:> 
> Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 
> Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ 
>

Am Montag, 23. November 2015 16:55:05 UTC+1 schrieb Cédric Krier:
>
> On 2015-11-23 06:42, Hendrik Brandes wrote: 
> > Am Samstag, 21. November 2015 14:35:04 UTC+1 schrieb Cédric Krier: 
> > > Using multi-company should always been the last solution because it is 
> > > complex and has many constraints like using exactly the same sets of 
> > > modules for all companies etc. 
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok, but that's no problem in this context at all. For me it looks like 
> an 
> > alternative idea for having this shared-warehouse concept. 
> > But through the discussions about having multi-company instances, I 
> wonder, 
> > how long this feature stays within the tryton-kernel. 
>
> I think you should ask the opposite question when will multi-company 
> available. But as usual, we can not answer such question. 
>
> > > Indeed what you describe looks like a EDI communication between the 
> > > companies. There have been already many discussion about this topic 
> but 
> > > as far as I know there is not yet any module available. 
> > > 
> > 
> > Regarding the EDI: Do you think, that using proteus within a tryton 
> module 
> > is possible? 
>
> I don't see the point. But I guess as far as you have the credentials. 
>

It's because of my less experiences with python ;-) I suggest, that it 
could be problematic 
when mixing concrete tryton objects with remote "proteus.tryton.xxxx" 
objects. So I think, I will give it a try!
 

>
> -- 
> Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL 
> Email/Jabber: [email protected] <javascript:> 
> Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 
> Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ 
>

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"tryton" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/7f719bc0-8767-4dcd-9183-462ebcb7dd70%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to