On 2015-11-23 06:42, Hendrik Brandes wrote: > Am Samstag, 21. November 2015 14:35:04 UTC+1 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > Using multi-company should always been the last solution because it is > > complex and has many constraints like using exactly the same sets of > > modules for all companies etc. > > > > Ok, but that's no problem in this context at all. For me it looks like an > alternative idea for having this shared-warehouse concept. > But through the discussions about having multi-company instances, I wonder, > how long this feature stays within the tryton-kernel.
I think you should ask the opposite question when will multi-company available. But as usual, we can not answer such question. > > Indeed what you describe looks like a EDI communication between the > > companies. There have been already many discussion about this topic but > > as far as I know there is not yet any module available. > > > > Regarding the EDI: Do you think, that using proteus within a tryton module > is possible? I don't see the point. But I guess as far as you have the credentials. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20151123155317.GK15014%40tetsuo.b2ck.com.
