Le 16/05/2015 20:41, Cédric Krier a écrit :
On 16 May 19:14, Christophe (net) wrote:
Hi,
I need to override a property field by a function field. All seems all right
but when i call the field my function isn't call. It seems that it is still
the old definition that is called.
Is it possible to make it in 3.4 ?
This is really not recommended (nor really supported) to change the type
of a field. You probably just need a new field.
I take note and I will put a new field, but can override the definition
of a field would have made it possible to avoid overloading each method
using this field.
By the way, a Property is already a Function field using custom getter,
setter and searcher.
That's why I thought I could more easily override, but I was wrong.
--
Christophe
http://adiczion.com
