On 16 May 19:14, Christophe (net) wrote: > Hi, > > I need to override a property field by a function field. All seems all right > but when i call the field my function isn't call. It seems that it is still > the old definition that is called. > Is it possible to make it in 3.4 ?
This is really not recommended (nor really supported) to change the type of a field. You probably just need a new field. By the way, a Property is already a Function field using custom getter, setter and searcher. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
