On 24 Jul 00:53, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton-dev] Toward a working multi-company" (Wed, 23 > Jul > 2014 22:54:04 +0200): > > > On 03 Jul 09:59, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was requested to provide a plan for multi-company as I say in > > > issue3974 [1]. > > > > > > TL;DR: drop record rule, add domain on fields > > > > Here is > > > > - the issue: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue4080 > > - the review: http://codereview.tryton.org/10461002/ > > Much appreciated! As we are at the point to make the decision for a customer > to > use a multi-company in favor of a multi-database setup I want to ask, if we > can > supposedly rely on this feature in the future. If there are uncertainties > about > the persistance of this feature, please let us know.
For me, it is the way to go but still waiting feedback from others. But about "feature" as you can see it is more about removing rules than adding new stuff. The new code is mainly adding missing domain (should be there in any cases) or missing company field and in few places it just hard code the previous rule because anything else don't make sense (ex: stock quantity) > BTW the current multi-company support wrt. to shared models would work quite > well for this use case. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpnEPzyGqpNO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
