On 8 de març de 2014 11:52:33 CET, "Cédric Krier" <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com> wrote: >On 08 Mar 01:22, Cédric Krier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just strated «grafting» changeset to series and I discover a side >> effect of the named branch. >> The hgroundup hook updates the old issue with branch backport >> information [1] which is great but it also makes roundup to set the >> status to chatting. I don't feel to go back to all «grafted» issue to >> reset the status to resolved. So I propose that the hgroundup hook >set >> always the status of the issue to resolved. This means that when >working >> on an issue which will require many changesets over a long period, >the >> status should be reset to in-progress manually because it will be set >to >> resolved on each commit. >> >> What do you think? > >By the way over past few months, I had only one issue where I push a >changeset but did not want to resolve the issue. I think default >behavior should match the major case.
Completly agree! -- Enviado desde mi teléfono Android con K-9 Mail. Disculpa mi brevedad
