On 08 Mar 02:21, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Cédric Krier: " [tryton-dev] Side effect of named branch" (Sat, 8 Mar 2014
>   01:22:33 +0100):
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just strated «grafting» changeset to series and I discover a side
> > effect of the named branch.
> > The hgroundup hook updates the old issue with branch backport
> > information [1] which is great but it also makes roundup to set the
> > status to chatting. I don't feel to go back to all «grafted» issue to
> > reset the status to resolved. So I propose that the hgroundup hook set
> > always the status of the issue to resolved. This means that when working
> > on an issue which will require many changesets over a long period, the
> > status should be reset to in-progress manually because it will be set to
> > resolved on each commit.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > 
> > [1] https://bugs.tryton.org/issue3688
> 
> That's the reason, why we adapted the script to use xml-rpc. Like this it is
> possible to keep/reset the state of the issue. Find a review at [1].
> 
> [1] http://codereview.tryton.org/4201002

I don't want to store (and set) in clear text a paswword for the bot.

-- 
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

Attachment: pgpawBt03bY5w.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to