2014-01-25 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > On 25 Jan 21:59, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> In other cases, though, it is a set of products that are changed from >> "Reduced VAT" to "Standard VAT" even if the percentages of those types >> do not change. >> >> This would require making taxes on products depend on dates. In this >> case, not sure about the others, it seems it'd be somewhat better to >> define a "Tax Period" that defines the date interval the taxes should >> be applied. This way, encoding would be faster and less error prone >> than having to specify for each product the date and the tax. > > It don't think it is necessary. You just have to change the taxes on the > products. Because tax links are copied on the invoice line so changing > it on product doesn't impact to existing invoices. More over for the > tricky case, accountant can still edit the default taxes on the invoice.
Right, but you must ensure that you change the tax of those products just the day the law change applies. The advantage of dates is that you can start changing product taxes days before the system actually has to use them. > I don't want to bloat Tryton for such special cases when other solution > exists. I'm not specially concerned with this either. > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
