On 17/12/11 19:33 +0100, Jordi Esteve wrote: > En/na Cédric Krier ha escrit: > >On 17/12/11 15:52 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >>At the same time, there are some use cases in which a kit can be > >>used to include another product automatically, while the "kit > >>product" has a meaning as a product too. > > > >I think it is wrong to have the kit meaning a product. In this case, it > >must be done with production. > > A kit of products is very similar to a product except for the cost > information. A kit is sold, sent, invoiced.
I think a "kit product" can not go in the accounting because as you said it must not have a cost. > Most of the product > fields are useful for kits. And as Albert has explained, most of the > companies using kits don't do any production. Using list of > materials and production orders has no sense for them. So using kits > of products is more convenient in these scenarios. I think that in some cases it is a production but a very simple production like just put products together. This kind of production could be managed in background for the user if needed. But in most cases, I think a kit is just a marketing object but it must be managed as a set of products and it is just a matter of presentation in orders (in the reports). -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpRHU2oIuP52.pgp
Description: PGP signature
