> on amd64 it works correctly: > > nm elfmix1.not_a > return42_or_3_long_name.o: > 0000000000000000 T return42_or_3 > return42_or_3_long_name.obj: > 0000000000000000 T return42_or_3
No, on amd64 the bug is the same as on i386. The correct output on both i386 and amd64 must be: return42_or_3_long_name.o: 0000000000000000 T return42_or_3 return42_or_3_long_name.obj: 00000000 T return42_or_3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: New Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
