Launchpad has imported 2 comments from the remote bug at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-09-24T11:10:32+00:00 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Created attachment 12001 example This happens since binutils 2.32.51.20190611 (The Debian version mostly tracks svn) and it was working on 2.32-8 (updated to 20190424) to reproduce: nm elfmix1.not_a nm: 42-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: 43-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: Mach-O.o: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.o: 0000000000000000 T return42_or_3 nm: return42_or_3_long_name.c: file format not recognized nm: regen_elfmix.sh: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.obj: ffa49ce800000000 T return42_or_3 before, with old binutils it was printed correctly nm elfmix1.not_a nm: 42-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: 43-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: Mach-O.o: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.o: 0000000000000000 T return42_or_3 nm: return42_or_3_long_name.c: file format not recognized nm: regen_elfmix.sh: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.obj: 00000000 T return42_or_3 Looks like the returned output is half full of uninitialized values on amd64 it works correctly nm elfmix1.not_a nm: 42-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: 43-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: Mach-O.o: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.o: 0000000000000000 T return42_or_3 nm: return42_or_3_long_name.c: file format not recognized nm: regen_elfmix.sh: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.obj: 0000000000000000 T return42_or_3 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1845190/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-09-24T11:12:39+00:00 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Please see this Debian discussion for more information https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1845190/comments/1 ** Changed in: binutils Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: binutils Importance: Unknown => Medium ** Bug watch added: salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues #69 https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: New Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
