I doubt excludenodes does any good, as tpo stated the behavior of how
Tor will react to it is not studied well and might be disabled in the
future. Aside from that just because too many nodes puppet up or you
feel suspecious doesnt necessary be worse than any old trusted node
located within spying countries like US or UK or Germany..etc or even
anywhere. What im trying to say is we need permanent design mitigation
to solve that not temporary blockage of x or y then another a and b will
pop up and the game continues forever...
li...@for-privacy.net:
On 26.10.2020 00:54, nusenu wrote:
These 600 (and other) are easy to block in torrc:
ExcludeNodes Unnamed,default,ididnteditheconfig
tor's man page disagrees:
ExcludeNodes node,node,...
A list of identity fingerprints, country codes, and address
patterns of nodes to avoid when building a circuit.
You're right. I read that in Jens Kubieziel's German blog. (very old
pages) Nicknames were allowed earlier?
Country codes are too error-prone. My exits are in Luxembourg. Tor
Metrics shows it wrong in the US. :-(
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/family:6D6EC2A2E2ED8BFF2D4834F8D669D82FC2A9FA8D
376DC7CAD597D3A4CBB651999CFAD0E77DC9AE8C
5D84900DBE6D6365684A9675B81A68ACE9577A68
Banning nicknames in ExcludeNodes is than a missing feature by me.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
