On 17/11/2017 05:51, Cyberpotato wrote: > Is there any sort of limit (artificial, performance, or otherwise) to the > number of hidden service descriptors or .onion addresses i can generate > and/or use to access a single hidden service? The use case would be to > generate a unique .onion address/descriptor for each user of a hidden > service. If i were to generate and advertise/introduce, let's say 500 (or > more) unique hidden service descriptors, would there be any issue with that? > Is building & maintaining that many circuits practical or possible?
Yes, it's possible but Tor will crash: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/15251 GlobaLeaks project do integrate Tor with dynamic setup of Tor Onion Services and by Q1/2018 will release a project that require setup of about 9600 Tor Onion Services, so we will probably work on it somehow. Each GlobaLeaks instance will have it's own HTTPS certificate enrolled and maintained automatically with LetsEncrypt and it's own Onion Service. This project will be setting up a virtual GlobaLeaks for each italian public agencies in an automated way, as a massive-scale anti-corruption project. If someone is going or willing to support Tor debugging to achieve that goal, we'll be more than happy. Fabio -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
