On 25 September 2016 at 19:14, Alec Muffett <alec.muff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> An organisation's response to scraping seems typically the product of:
>
> 1) the technical resources at its disposal
> 2) its ability to distinguish scraping from non-scraping traffic
> 3) the benefit to the organisation of sieving-out and handling the
> non-scraping traffic, rather than ignoring it all
>
Just to reinforce this a bit, it's not only the biggest/hugest names:
Why does @Airbnb not allow connections over Tor?
https://twitter.com/dosch/status/777602410978086912 (and thread)
I haven't actually tested this "block", nor do I have any special knowledge
of Airbnb, but I would expect them to suffer similarly from scraping & spam
sourced by people of bad intention who use Tor to hide their tracks.
I believe that I suggested "outreach", and perhaps "charm", as being
beneficial for turning companies from "victims of Tor" into "evangelists
for Tor"? :-) <hint/>
- alec
--
http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/aboutalecm
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
