-------- Original Message --------
From: Sean Lynch <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Using SDR
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:16:58 +0000
 

> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:51 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > From: Sean Lynch <[email protected]>
> > Apparently from: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Using SDR
> > Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 20:40:21 +0000
> >  
> > 
> > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:23 PM coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 2/5/16, Sean Lynch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  > ... Radio is being used right now to provide anonymity, but it's 
> > > > being used[1]
> > > > > to hide endpoints similar to the duct-taped payphone trick depicted in
> > > > > Hackers, in order to avoid attacks like the one used to capture Ross
> > > > > Ulbricht without giving him a chance to wipe his computer (they snuck 
> > > > > up
> > > > > behind him and pinned his arms, but they would have just rushed him 
> > > > > had
> > > > > that not been possible). If you use a device like the ProxyHam and 
> > > > > you sit
> > > > > somewhere where you can see it, there's a reasonable chance you'd spot
> > > > > someone who's trying to find you, giving you a chance to hit your 
> > > > > panic
> > > > > button and escape.
> > > > 
> > > > this assumes you're keeping it under constant supervision, of course :P
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Indeed. Having a spotter there is probably the best solution.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Alternatively, if you aren't too clumbsy or forgetful, is to have a some 
> > > sort of hidden/innocuous band tied to you and to your device (e.g., a 
> > > laptop) that when pulled too hard (like a grenade pin) starts the wiping 
> > > process. So if you are jumped/pinned the process starts before the 
> > > attackers realize it.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
>  
> Yep, a dead-man switch of some kind is a good idea regardless of what other 
> techniques you're using.
>   
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > A related LPI method is to use a separate, well disciplined, carrier 
> > > > (in-band, co-located or not) that  participant devices listen to and 
> > > > use the sync their clocks and/or their codes. If used carefully Eve 
> > > > won't know about it and will find it too difficult to synch in time 
> > > > catch Alice and Bob's comms.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
>  
> Sure, but if you have a very long (or effectively infinite) PN sequence, your 
> carrier needs to be structured enough to recover some large counter. GPS 
> qualifies, as probably does WWV and its non-US brethren.
>  
> > 
> > > 
> > > How do you train out of band? By modelling the environment? That's an 
> > > interesting thought, and I suspect Google Earth has enough data to be 
> > > able to do it in a lot of places. Are you aware of free or inexpensive 
> > > software packages for doing this?
> > >  
> > > > 
> > > >  synthetic aperature millimeter wave vision systems are also pushing
> > > > along this boundary, for cross-pollination of suitable phased sync'ed
> > > > UWB MIMO signal processing.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Aren't you just talking phased array for something like this though? Or 
> > > do you mean using phase information from the receive antennas to 
> > > reconstruct the environment rather than using phasing at the transmit 
> > > side to steer your beam? That's a very interesting idea since it can give 
> > > you a 360 degree view with no need to steer your beam, in the same way 
> > > that some blind humans can use clicks to get a picture of their entire 
> > > environment. (I use humans and not bats because I think bat sonar is 
> > > pretty directional, whereas human ears can localize sound quite precisely 
> > > without any need to turn one's head.)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Beam stearing be accomplished much cheaper than via a phased array using 
> > > nearfield plasmas to block or steer the beam. For example, a vertical 
> > > cluster of flourescent tubes surrounding a simple dipole can, with proper 
> > > circuitry, quickly switched so that only one of the tubes is "off" 
> > > (transparent) at a time allowing incoming/outgoing signasl to only 
> > > propagate in that direction. The other tubes are "on" and reflect the 
> > > signals.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
>  
> Sure, if you don't care about MIMO, there are lots of ways to steer your beam 
> using relatively cheap circuitry. You can have multiple transmit/receive 
> antennas and just adjust their relative phase. AIUI this is how the LoJack 
> locators operate. Switching reflectors on and off independently as you 
> suggest here would allow multiple beams, though their relative phase would 
> not be adjustable. It all goes toward the goal of minimizing the amount of 
> energy you emit that isn't directed toward the receiver, though.
> 
> For privacy in ptp links and a highly directional antenna (e.g., a parabolic 
> dish) one can take a cue from covert radar tech. Alice geometrically moves 
> around the transmit signal, and thus far-field phase, using a "matrixed" 
> near-field feed that switches randomly at >> than the symbol rate. If you can 
> adequately suppress the switching noise the phase shifts make it near 
> impossible for an off-axis (> 0.5 degrees for a 32-element 2D feed) Eve to 
> even detect that a signal exists. Bob, all other things being equal, using a 
> standard receiver, should have no problem with receiving. This tech is 
> practiced only at the antenna and, like Orbital Angular Momentum, should work 
> with near any emission type or protocol without need modify other equipment.
>  
> Thanks for posting the latest version of your slides. I read what I think was 
> an earlier version previously. I am working on upgrading my amateur radio 
> license, so soon I will get some experience with some of the weak signal 
> modes you talk about.
> 
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Reply via email to