I didn't say wondering about an anomaly is disrespectful. Assuming you have the right bring their relay's to everyone's attention is disrespectful. This is a network around privacy and anonymity after-all. Isn't there a better way to start a witch hunt? Like discovering relay's that do something wrong first? Who cares if they don't have ContactInfo. It's not mandatory. Do you know how long these relay were intended to stay up? What about the state of their configuration? Are they complete? Was the operator intending to add that information at a later time after changing the configuration.
It's like saying we know they've not read the manual and they are intending ill-will. It's rude. Plain and simple. Not to mention I see lots of relay without valid ContactInfo or questionable ContactInfo. I mean no disrespect. Seriously though; do you think every researcher wants their relay's to be identified or linked to their research. Because tor network is only filled with well-meaning people right? --leeroy -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
