On 9/20/20 12:57 PM, Felix wrote: >> > Libressl 321 is not compatible to what is needed to make the authorities > tor26, dizum, gabel., maatu. and longc. happy (let them not grant a > "Running"). What can that be? Just upgraded here 2 tor-0.4.5.0 (Gentoo Linux, same ip) from 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 Will see how it works by restarting one of the two Tor instances...
-- Toralf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays