On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:34:19 +0000, Aeris wrote: ... > And there is also an hardware bottleneck, because every components (mainly > ethernet & SD card here) are connected to the same physical USB controller > limited to 480Mbps for *overall* transfer (network + disk + others USB).
Which isn't that small. tor does not do disk (or 'other'), and 25MByte/s is quite a lot - more than I can push with big iron due to traffic limits. ... > No no, GB. 128GB is usual on server. We even begin to see 1TB RAM machine. You mean 'this is what you usually get as a server machine', not 'this is what tor typically uses, right? Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
