On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:32:25 +0000, admin wrote:
...
>  > I do similar, but I run a simple cronjob around ifconfig. :-) Also for 
>  > seeing the total traffic consumption on my relays (and my home DSL). 
>  > I then feed that into gnuplot for some graphs for me to see; and 
>  > the interplay of RelayBandwithRate and RelayBandwidthBurst ist 
>  > pretty plain to see in there. 
>  > 
> Nice approach. Would you mind sharing your fingerprint/nickname? I'd love to 
> look at it with Atlas.

Atlas is too coarse to see that... or rather it looks like it doesn't
believe in traffic that exceed the advertized bandwidth:

http://atlas.torproject.org/?#details/26220AEA188B8D0E47BB541E1A616EB3AD70295F

My graphs look like (not the near realtime one; just a sample):

http://ch.iocl.org/tor/relay.png

There you have the overruns and the following flatline in traffic
as long as the 'Burst' is consumed.

For comparison, my home dsl, where another relay does a burst
(the part where out is half of in+out0:

http://ch.iocl.org/tor/dsl.png

(I also do plots of volume over time.)

...
> Ok, to be brutally honest, I'm obviously too naive at the moment to 
> understand the actual issue thoroughly. Are you referring to some opportunity 
> to draw conclusions about specific Tor users and effectively track/"uncover" 
> them?

Yes; although it's probably too little data indeed as long as you don't
know where it's going; and most relays (esp. the exits) are too busy
to produce discernible patterns this way.

...
> We use the stats for a better understanding of total traffic, especially over 
> time (e.g. I already noticed that there are some adjustments to the config 
> needed for daily accounting/bandwidthrate/-burst for our higher bw relays 
> utilizing these very traffic stats - as it seems, while the higher bw relays 
> are blowing traffic out the door like crazy ;-), especially asurahosting1, 
> the lower bw relays, e.g. tailoredvps1, do not even utilize the accounting to 
> its full potential without a slightly higher bw_adv)

Indeed. Q is mostly burning its assigned bandwidth (and I wouldn't like
to have circuits through it while it is in 'flatline'), while the
home relay only sees occasional downloads (flat bursts), and the
bridges hardly have any traffic.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to