I'll post any skeds for others to participate as well. stay safe!
jim ab3cv On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:51 PM Jim Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been looking at FST4 as a possibility for getting some more difficult > new ones on 160. > > From Table 7 in > https://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.4.0-rc1.html#SLOW_MODES > > you can see that FST4 with 60 second periods is 3db more sensitive than > JT65 and 7db more sensitive than FT8. > > I enjoy CW but will use FT8 when it gets the job done. But there are times > when even FT8 doesn't get through. > > I've used JT65 in the past but when FT8 came along everyone hopped on it. > > FST4 at 60 second periods is obviously slower but has the same automation > features that the newer WSJT-x modes have. > > I'd like to find a partner in EU or AS who would sked with me to do some > FST4 tests on 160. > > Anyone? > > Stay safe > > jim ab3cv > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
