I've been looking at FST4 as a possibility for getting some more difficult new ones on 160.
>From Table 7 in https://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.4.0-rc1.html#SLOW_MODES you can see that FST4 with 60 second periods is 3db more sensitive than JT65 and 7db more sensitive than FT8. I enjoy CW but will use FT8 when it gets the job done. But there are times when even FT8 doesn't get through. I've used JT65 in the past but when FT8 came along everyone hopped on it. FST4 at 60 second periods is obviously slower but has the same automation features that the newer WSJT-x modes have. I'd like to find a partner in EU or AS who would sked with me to do some FST4 tests on 160. Anyone? Stay safe jim ab3cv _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
