Remy Maucherat schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker 2005/06/29 19:49:38
With a 16K bufferSize, the APR connector is no longer the clear
winner in performance. For BC, it's currently disabled by default,
but it's easy enough to change that after some more testing.
Yes, I can see performance is better too. It's also possible that
taking the APR code, and rewriting it with regular Java IO would also
yield slightly better results (regular HTTP is still a little faster
than APR HTTP - some VMs make the difference very small, but the VM I
use for testing is definitely not the best for JNI).
Now that I've looked at it a lot, however, I dislike the Java AJP
impl, as it's way overengineered in comparison to what it required by
the current Tomcat.
Very true.... I don't like this part of the source. I think we can
implement the AJP integration simpler and extract the jk2 mbeans and
mx4j JMX
integration.
Peter
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
J2EE Systemarchitekt und Tomcat Experte
http://objektpark.de/
http://tomcat.objektpark.org/
http://centaurus.sourceforge.net/
Am Josephsschacht 72, 44879 Bochum, Deutschland
Telefon: (49) 234 9413228
Mobil: (49) 175 1660884
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
