[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker 2005/06/29 19:49:38
With a 16K bufferSize, the APR connector is no longer the clear
winner in performance. For BC, it's currently disabled by default,
but it's easy enough to change that after some more testing.
Yes, I can see performance is better too. It's also possible that taking
the APR code, and rewriting it with regular Java IO would also yield
slightly better results (regular HTTP is still a little faster than APR
HTTP - some VMs make the difference very small, but the VM I use for
testing is definitely not the best for JNI).
Now that I've looked at it a lot, however, I dislike the Java AJP impl,
as it's way overengineered in comparison to what it required by the
current Tomcat.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
