Henri Yandell <flamefew <at> gmail.com> writes: > However, SVN has sufficient advantages on the server-side for the > people administrating the Apache boxes to long for it, and the choice > of techs is a balance between various people's requirements. > > I've nudged Infra to see if they're planning to propose the > CVS-tuning-off proposal to the community soon, as the earlier the > better.
"Propose" or "impose" ? Typically 'propose' means the community would have some way to say 'yes' or 'no'. I agree SVN is better - and for a new project it would certainly be the top choice. But I can't believe maintaining cvs for existing projects ( or the few projects that chose to keep using it ) is such a huge burden. If this is an issue of resources - will this be solved if someone would volunteer to maintain it ? Or maybe if some company would donate the money for a hosting service ( like openoffice.org or java.net seem to work ) ? Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
