When the SVN support will be included in base Eclipse may be ... For now CVS on Eclipse is just great and more important works without flaw....
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:33:27 +0000 (UTC), Costin Manolace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell <flamefew <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > However, SVN has sufficient advantages on the server-side for the > > people administrating the Apache boxes to long for it, and the choice > > of techs is a balance between various people's requirements. > > > > I've nudged Infra to see if they're planning to propose the > > CVS-tuning-off proposal to the community soon, as the earlier the > > better. > > "Propose" or "impose" ? Typically 'propose' means the community would have > some > way to say 'yes' or 'no'. > > I agree SVN is better - and for a new project it would certainly be the top > choice. But I can't believe maintaining cvs for existing projects ( or the few > projects that chose to keep using it ) is such a huge burden. > > If this is an issue of resources - will this be solved if someone would > volunteer to maintain it ? Or maybe if some company would donate the money > for a > hosting service ( like openoffice.org or java.net seem to work ) ? > > Costin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
