From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >My position remains that the above reasons are sufficient > justification for the > >patch to remain. > > > > > My position remains the same as well.
Making the value of the server header configurable, as per Tim's suggestion earlier in this thread, would meet the user requirement described in bug 16254 which is my main concern. Providing this is done in a way that doesn't impact performance, would you find this an acceptable compromise? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
