Bill Barker wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1. I disagree with this change, sorry. We are going to keepalive in this case (anything which isn't a status drop, which is the whole point). The error flag can be set by a sendError, which could send any status code.billbarker 2004/11/19 19:04:28
Modified: http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
If we are in the error state, we aren't going to keep-alive. So don't lie to the UA that we >are.
Fix for Bug #32292
You're vote would be more convincing if anything that you said was actually true ;-). We're note going to keepalive, and you can't set if from sendError.
It's not true ? Did I miss something ? The thing with sendError and not closing the connection is that often sendError is used to trigger pretty standard error pages.
This is the 'error' flag in Http11Processor. It's set in various 'catch' blocks, and for a couple of places where the request can't be parsed (mostly the Host header and the Protocol). In particular, it isn't visible to the Response :). Once it is set, it is never cleared, and being set causes the Processor to drop out of the keep-alive loop.
Thanks for the explanation (you don't have to revert a patch right away, BTW). As the error flag is used in the loop, and does not depend on sendError, then the patch was fine. I didn't look in detail at that code for a while, and I forgot the subtelties.
Rémy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]