Patching Tomcat 4.1.30 is pretty much what I have done. I spent a lot of effort getting our installation working in a stable way. And a lot of that effort was in applying patches similar to the ones that are in the baseline but have never been released.

As far as moving to Tomcat 5.x, I have a ton of applications running on 4.1.x and moving them forward is no small task for me. In fact, the effort of stabilizing Tomcat 4.1.x has me gun shy. I will probably wait a year or so more until I know things are REALLY good and stable first. Eventually I will have to bite the bullet and do so but I thought it might be nice to get a 4.1.31 release (which adds a ton of stability fixes) in the interim so I could remove my custom patches.

Charlie Cox hit it on the head with his response:

Because a 4.1.x upgrade is not an api change. There is much more testing
involved in upgrading to a new major version than a point release. The
problem is finding the time to review the (possible)effects of 5.x on your
installation and all your applications when you could roll out a point
release with much less effort.

I appreciate everyone's feedback and understand why you don't want to release a new 4.1.x. I don't necessarily agree it's a good thing since there are a lot of installations of 4.1 out there that would benefit, but I can live with it. Maybe I'll be back next year with questions about 5.1. ;-)


Sorry for rocking the boat and thanks,
~Tom

On Aug 20, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Jess Holle wrote:

I've said too much on this already, but if you really need 4.1.x and bug fixes thereto, then why not take Tomcat 4.1.30 and patch it as necessary to address bugs of sufficient concern and deliver that to your customer/user base?

That seems like a better solution for all than a 4.1.31 release.

--
Jess Holle

Shapira, Yoav wrote:

Hi,
I agree with Jess, this is the wrong direction in principle.  We're
encouraging users to stick with 4.1.x if we do this release.

Normally we have just an informal "if everyone is OK with this, I'd like
to push out release X on this day" and then a vote on labeling it as
stable. The latter being the only official vote. But in this case, I'd
want to have a more general vote of should we have 4.1.x maintenance
releases, given the reasons stated earlier in this thread.


If we have such a vote, and if it passes, and if you decide to go ahead
with this release, then you will probably assume responsibility for bugs
filed against 4.1.x. This is of course unofficial, but nonetheless this
type of arrangement exists with Tomcat 3.3.x. None of us care much for
the 4.1.x issues now, except that Mark moved the relevant
Connector-related issues from 4.1.x to 5.0.x so that they don't get
dropped. This type of move, which I didn't like originally, should
definitely be stopped if 4.1.x is still in active development as
indicated by regular releases.


Man this is a bummer going into the weekend ;)

Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to