----- Original Message ----- From: "j.random.programmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 12:31 PM Subject: RE: getReader() BUG in tomcat 4.1.30 and beyond ?
> >"Yoav Shapira" wrote thusly: > >I saw your message on tomcat-user. Several other > >Tomcat developers also follow that list. I > personally > >looking at the stack trace chose to discard your > >message for a few reasons: > > You reply is retarded; more signifantly you are not > and > have never been a core developer ON THE JSP CODE. > What you choose to do is irrelevant. > > The bug is very real. > > That my twice posted message (on both dev and user) > got > no response from core developers is frightening. Ok, a response from a core (connector) developer: I tested your report on TC 5 and the JKCoyote connector, and it works perfectly. Since what I choose to do is also irrelevant (and I wouldn't have it any other way :), I'm choosing not to look into it further. However, if you see this problem on 3.3.2, I'd be more than happy to look at it again ;-). > > >- The AJP connector in the stack trace indicates > Apache > >in front of Tomcat, making Apache and the AJP > connector > >possible culprits. Unless you reproduce this with > >Tomcat standalone, I'm not convinced. > > A simple servlet using the same setup does not display > the bug. I can getInputStream() OR getReader() from a > servlet's doPost method and print out the entire > POST'ed body. The bug only happens for JSP's in > tomcat 4.1.30 and beyond. > > >- The fact it's 4.1.30, which is a mature branch > that's > >been in the market for a while, and if what you're > >reporting is really true we would have heard about it > >via bug reports a long time ago. > > 'tis better to remain silent and appear a fool than to > speak and remove all doubt ... (and your above > statement removes all doubt). > > >- Also being on a 4.x release, I'm not as interested, > >because only 5.x is being actively developed. If you > >reported this error on 5.0.27 standalone tomcat I > >suspect you would have gotten replies on the tomcat- > >user list from me and others. > > Don't matter if "you" are interested or not. The bug > is > real and needs to be fixed by the core developers for > the hundreds of thousands of people who are using the > stable 4.1.x branch today. > Patches are alway welcome ;-). > And if the core developers are so cock-sure that this > is not a bug, then why don't they at least say that > they could NOT replicate this ? After all, the sample > jsp that shows the bug is only a few lines long and > extremely simple to test. > > Again, I don't know what is more troubling: the > severity of this bug, your post, or the total lack > of response from the core jsp developers (one way or > another).... > > Best regards, > > --j > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
